Body Composition · Formula v1.0

Body Fat Percentage Calculator

Estimate body fat percentage and lean mass using the U.S. Navy circumference method.

Track the trend over weeks , not a single reading. At the worked-example inputs, the estimated body fat is 18.8%. The result estimates the share of your weight that is fat and the lean mass that remains. On the example, about 19% body fat and 138 pounds of lean mass. Rough ranges for adult men are about 6% to 24% and for adult women about 14% to 31%, depending on age and fitness, and athletes run lower. Use the estimate to track changes over months rather than to judge a single value: a falling waist measurement with stable weight suggests fat loss. It returns estimated body fat, estimated lean body mass.

FreeNo sign-upInputs stay in-browserCSV exportReviewed August 28, 2026
LAST REVIEWEDAugust 28, 2026Inputs stay in your browser
Live calculation

Enter your numbers

Calculated result
Estimated body fat18.8%
Estimated lean body mass138
Sensitivity check

What if weight changes?

-10% input18.8%
0% input18.8%
+10% input18.8%

Transparent method

The formula

U.S. Navy method: men use waist and neck. Women add hip. Both use log₁₀ of the circumference differences.

Worked example

Estimated body fat18.8%
Estimated lean body mass138

Example inputs

SexMale
Weight170
Waist circumference34
Neck circumference15
Hip circumference40
Height67

How to interpret the result

The Navy circumference method estimates body fat from a handful of tape-measure readings, and small measurement inconsistencies, exactly where the tape sits, how tight it's pulled, move the result more than people expect for a method this simple. A single reading is a rough estimate, useful mainly as a starting point rather than a precise number to act on.

Before you rely on it

What to check

Track the trend across several measurements taken the same way each time, rather than treating one reading as a precise, final figure.

The common error

Where people go wrong with body fat percentage calculator

Comparing a single reading against a strict target number as if it were lab-grade precise. Tape placement and tension shift the result enough that trend over weeks tells a more reliable story than any one measurement.

Sensitivity evidence

How waist circumference changes the estimated body fat

Body Fat Percentage Calculator: estimated body fat and estimated lean body mass across a range of waist circumference, every other input held at the worked-example value.
Waist circumferenceEstimated body fatEstimated lean body mass
272.0%166.6
3112.4%148.9
34worked example18.8%138
3724.3%128.7
4130.6%118

Every input, tested

Which input moves the estimated body fat most

Body Fat Percentage Calculator: estimated body fat with each input moved on its own, every other input held at the worked-example value.
InputTested fromToEstimated body fat at each endSwing
Waist circumference313712.4% to 24.3%11.9% (63%)
SexMaleFemale18.8% to 32.2%13.4% (71%)
Neck circumference141720.8% to 14.7%6.1% (32%)
Height607422.2% to 15.8%6.4% (34%)
Weight15318718.8% to 18.8%none
Hip circumference364418.8% to 18.8%none

Two variables at once

Estimated body fat by waist circumference and neck circumference

Body Fat Percentage Calculator: estimated body fat at each combination of waist circumference (rows) and neck circumference (columns).
Waist circumference \ Neck circumference121518
2710.0%2.0%2.0%
3118.8%12.4%4.7%
3424.3%18.8%12.4%
3729.1%24.3%18.8%
4134.6%30.6%26.0%

Step by step

The worked example, input by input

Worked-example inputs and the results they produce for the body fat percentage calculator.
InputValue usedWhat it means
SexMaleUsed because the Navy method uses different circumference terms by sex.
Weight170Body weight in pounds.
Waist circumference34Measured at the navel, in inches.
Neck circumference15Measured below the larynx, in inches.
Hip circumference40Measured at the widest point. Used for women only.
Height67Height in inches.
Estimated body fat18.8%
Estimated lean body mass138

Inputs, definitions and assumptions

Sex

Used because the Navy method uses different circumference terms by sex.

Weight

Body weight in pounds.

Waist circumference

Measured at the navel, in inches.

Neck circumference

Measured below the larynx, in inches.

Hip circumference

Measured at the widest point. Used for women only.

Height

Height in inches.

Where the inputs come from

The US Navy method uses circumference measurements taken with a flexible tape. Measure the waist at the navel for men, or at the narrowest point for women, the neck below the larynx, and for women the hips at the widest point. Keep the tape snug but not compressing the skin, measure standing relaxed, and take each measurement two or three times and average. Height and weight are also needed. Use the same technique each time so changes are comparable.

When the result stops applying

Circumference formulas are estimates with an error of several percentage points compared with DEXA scans or hydrostatic weighing. Tape placement, body shape and bloating change the result. The method is less accurate for very lean or very heavy people. It says nothing about where fat is deposited beyond the waist, and it is not a medical diagnosis.

What to compare it with

Compare with the lean body mass calculator, which uses a different formula, and see the BMI and waist-to-hip ratio pages for other screens. The BMR and TDEE calculators use body weight for energy needs. For a more accurate reading, a DEXA scan or a professional assessment is the reference.

People also ask

Frequently asked questions

How accurate is the Navy body fat method?

It is usually within a few percentage points of more precise methods for average bodies, but errors are larger for very lean or very heavy people and depend on how carefully you measure.

What is a healthy body fat percentage?

It varies with age and sex, but roughly 10% to 25% for men and 20% to 32% for women is a common healthy range, with athletes lower.

How often should I measure?

Every two to four weeks under the same conditions, since daily changes from water and food are bigger than real changes.

Common body composition questions

Sources and evidence